Community Size, Heterogeneity and Voter Turnouts
نویسندگان
چکیده
Numerous studies have found a negative relationship between the closeness of an election, the size of the electorate and voter turnout. It is often claimed that this relationship supports the rational voter hypothesis, with closeness and size proxying for the decisiveness of a vote. We offer a different interpretation. Larger communities are more heterogeneous than smaller ones, and turnouts are inversely related to the heterogeneity of a community. We present empirical support for this hypothesis using data for voter turnouts in Norwegian school language referendums. Community size is found to have a negative effect on voter turnouts, even after accounting for the probability of a single vote being decisive and the linguistic dimension of this heterogeneity. Our findings question the adequacy of the turnout regression in testing the rational voter hypothesis, as neither a positive correlation between closeness and turnout, nor a negative correlation between size and turnout can be exclusively attributed to instrumental voting. JEL-Codes: D70, D72, C16
منابع مشابه
E-Governance: Enabling the French Web 2.0 Revolution?
Mature democracies increasingly confront the dilemma of apathetic citizens who have become disenchanted with traditional channels of participation in democratic governance procedures. In representative democracies in particular, this apathy is exemplified by falling voter turnouts, party memberships and participation in community association. To counter apathy, e-governance techniques including...
متن کاملVoting as a rational choice: the effect of preferences regarding the well-being of others∗
For voters with “social” preferences, the expected utility of voting is approximately independent of the size of the electorate, suggesting that rational voter turnouts can be substantial even in large elections. Less important elections are predicted to have lower turnout, but a feedback mechanism keeps turnout at a reasonable level under a wide range of conditions. The main contributions of t...
متن کاملVoting as a Rational Choice: Why and How People Vote to Improve the Well-Being of Others
For voters with ‘social’ preferences, the expected utility of voting is approximately independent of the size of the electorate, suggesting that rational voter turnouts can be substantial even in large elections. Less important elections are predicted to have lower turnout, but a feedback mechanism keeps turnout at a reasonable level under a wide range of conditions. The main contributions of t...
متن کاملCommunity Heterogeneity and Revealed Preferences for Environmental Goods
Objectives: This paper studies the links between community heterogeneity and the public provision of environmental goods. Methods: This paper examines 2000 referenda data from California. The models include socio-demographic characteristics, ideology, voter turnout, and measures of racial and educational homogeneity. Results: More heterogeneity is correlated with lower support for environmental...
متن کاملThe noisy voter model on complex networks
We propose a new analytical method to study stochastic, binary-state models on complex networks. Moving beyond the usual mean-field theories, this alternative approach is based on the introduction of an annealed approximation for uncorrelated networks, allowing to deal with the network structure as parametric heterogeneity. As an illustration, we study the noisy voter model, a modification of t...
متن کامل